Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_51_25 CDT 2000
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

E LP
Docket No. 2565-99
6 September 1999

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 September 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on
1 October 1981 for three years at age 18.
that you were advanced to LCPL (E-3) and served without incident
until 31 August 1982 when you received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for use of marijuana.
in rank to PFC (E-2), forfeitures of $309 per month for two
months, and 30 days of correctional custody.
advanced again to LCPL on 1 May 1983.

Punishment imposed was a reduction

The record reflects

However, you were

On 4 November 1983 you received a second NJP for possession of
marijuana.
Punishment consisted of a reduction in rank to PFC
and forfeitures of $320 per month for two months.

However, the record does show that on 16 November 1983

The discharge processing documentation is not on file in your
record.
the commanding officer recommended your discharge under other
than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug
abuse.

The discharge authority directed discharge under other

than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct and you were
informed that you were not recommended for reenlistment due to
drug abuse.
conditions on 14 December 1983.

You were discharged under other than honorable

The Board concluded that the foregoing

In this regard, the Board noted the aggravating

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity,
regret for the actions which led to your discharge, the letters
of reference attesting to your academic achievements since your
discharge, and the fact that it has been nearly 16 years since
you were discharged.
factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
discharge given your record of two NJPs for use or possession of
marijuana.
factor that you were a repeat offender.
willful disregard for the Marine Corp’s drug policy and
discipline.
consequences of further drug offenses, but failed to learn from
your first disciplinary experience.
achievements and pursuit of a masters degree, but concluded that
it was not sufficient to warrant recharacterization.
evidence to the contrary, the Board concluded that the discharge
was proper and no change is warranted.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It appeared to the Board you had to be aware of the

Accordingly, your

The names and votes of the members

This demonstrated a

The Board noted you academic

Absent

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have the

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02565-99

    Original file (02565-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, regret for the actions which led to your discharge, the letters of reference attesting to your academic achievements since your discharge, and the fact that it has been nearly 16 years since you were discharged. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03758-01

    Original file (03758-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A staff judge advocate reviewed the request and found On 5 October 1982 the You were so discharged on the.-service the Board carefully weighed In its review of your application, all potentially mitigating factors such as your letter in support of your application, your good post-service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00103-02

    Original file (00103-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The record reflects that you served without incident until December 1980 when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for possession of marijuana.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04252-01

    Original file (04252-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Docket No: 4252-01 23 November 2001 .This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02970-01

    Original file (02970-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. drugs. factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the serious nature of your repetitive drug related misconduct which resulted in five all the circumstances of your case, discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03029-01

    Original file (03029-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was a $286 forfeiture of pay, restriction for 30 days, extra duty for 45 days, and a reduction to On 14 December 1982, after undergoing a medical evaluation, medical authorities determined that you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03396-06

    Original file (03396-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 10 July 1979 at age 17. The punishment imposed was restriction and extra...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06886-97

    Original file (06886-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 15 April 1999 6886-97 Dear This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07585-08

    Original file (07585-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02681-01

    Original file (02681-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 April 1984 you received a second NJP for use of marijuana. Board concluded that these factors and contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two you were well aware of the Navy's drug policy and the adverse consequences that would result if you violated that policy. Board also noted the aggravating factor that you waived the right to present your case to an ADB, show why you should be retained or discharged under honorable conditions.